×
×

Case Victories

Home | Case Victories

Trademark Infringement

(Client Denoted in Blue)

LeBron James and LBJ Trademarks, LLC v. James Golding
Proceeding: 92072657
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Cancellation denied with prejudice by Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Description: LeBron James hired five lawyers to try to cancel our client’s trademark for KING JAMES then attempted to use the high cost of litigation to prevail. In the end, The Kinder Law Group obtained a (confidential) settlement for the client and a denial of the cancellation with prejudice. Did we win? We can’t tell you because it is confidential, but you can come to your own conclusion here: https://www.kingjames.co (client is still using the trademark).

MIB Security Group, LLC v. MIB-Shield
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: $1.6 Million Judgment and finding of willful trademark infringement.
Description: When a third party infringed our client’s trademark, we offered to settle for third party changing name and paying $100k in damages. When they refused, we went to trial and obtained a $1.6 Million judgment against the third party.

Sweet James v. Sweet Justice
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Case dismissed pursuant to confidential settlement agreement.
Description: Defended a trademark infringement action by personal injury attorneys SWEET JAMES against our client’s use of the SWEET JUSTICE trademark. Did we win? We can’t tell you because it is confidential, but you can come to your own conclusion here: www.sweetjustice.com (client is still using the trademark).

Gary Christopher v. Ryan Grepper
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Infringing trademark registrations cancelled by Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Description: Cancellation before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board for COOLEST coolers trademark registrations based upon client’s earlier trademark rights.

Structural Plastics v. Sam Pievac Company
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Settled pursuant to a confidential win-win settlement agreement.
Description: Trademark infringement lawsuit involving dispute over the rights to SPC.

Nova-Ortho Medical v. Farinpour
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement; Cybersquatting
Outcome: Settled with domain name being transferred back to client and client paying only the $10k for work performed.
Description: Client’s former IT person demanded nearly $40k (when only $10k worth of work had been performed) and hijacked client’s domain name as ransom. Initiated lawsuit in U.S. District Court for trademark infringement and cybersquatting.

Tom Penny and Flip Skateboards, Inc. v. Absolute International PTY LTD
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Settled pursuant to confidential agreement.
Description: Prosecution of trademark infringement action against PENNY skateboards in Central District of California Federal Court.

Metasoft v. Global Operations and Development
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Outcome: Settled Forcing Plaintiff to Pay All Costs and Attorney Fees.
Description: Defended action by Canadian company against Orange County based non-profit corporation.

New Enchantment v. The Journey Spa & Wellness Center
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Settled pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement.
Description: Defended a trademark infringement action involving the JOURNEY SPA trademark.

Venvest Ballard v. Clockwork Home Services
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Settled pursuant to confidential settlement agreement.
Description: Federal declaratory judgment action for non-infringement of trademark, non-compete and unfair competition.

Clutch Masters v. eClutchMaster
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Opposition granted, judgment for client, infringing application cancelled by Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Description: Opposition before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board for a trademark application directed to a mark confusingly similar to my client’s trademark.

RRLH, Inc. v. Golden Rain Foundation, Inc.
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Settled pursuant to confidential settlement agreement.
Description: Defense of trademark infringement claims concerning LEISURE WORLD trademark; prosecution of counterclaims. Settled pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement after substantial preparation and just a few days before trial scheduled to begin.

Prolab Nutrition, Inc. v. NBTY, Inc. and Met-Rx Substrate Technology, Inc.
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Settled pursuant to confidential settlement agreement.
Description: Prosecution of declaratory judgment action for non-infringement concerning MET-RX trademark; defense of counterclaims. Resolved via confidential settlement agreement.

Military Order of the Purple Heart v. Purple Heart Veterans Rehabilitation Services
Practice Area: Trademark Infringement
Outcome: Settled pursuant to confidential settlement agreement.
Description: Defended action for trademark infringement concerning PURPLE HEART trademark; prosecuted counterclaims for intentional interference with actual and prospective economic advantage.

Trademark Oppositions

Trademark Cancellations

Copyright Infringement

Domain Name Disputes

OVER 10+ Years of experience

Our lawyers are experienced and prepared to assist you with
any of your legal needs.

Testimonials